| Title | Corps et continuité. Remarques sur la "nouvelle" physique d'Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 299–318 |
| Categories | Review, Physics |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Dans l'horizon de l'étude de la philosophie naturelle d'Averroès, le nouveau travail de Ruth Glasner (RG) intitulé Averroes' Physics: a Turning Point in Medieval Natural Philosophy occupera assurément une place de premier plan. Dans cet ouvrage, RG propose une étude analytique des trois commentaires d'Averroès à la Physique d'Aristote - l'Abrégé, le Commentaire Moyen et le Grand Commentaire. La force incontestable de son travail réside tout d'abord dans son approche double du texte d'Averroès, à la fois philologique et théorique. Tout au long de son analyse, ces deux aspects restent intimement liés et la mobilisation des instruments philologiques n'est jamais une fin en soi. Cette analyse a en effet pour but ultime de reconstruire le système du monde tel qu'Averroès le concevait. L'enjeu fondamental de cette étude est alors de supplanter la vision d'un Averroès interprète servile de la physique aristotélicienne et de présenter sa conception de la nature comme un système cohérent, organique et original. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1534","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1534,"authors_free":[{"id":1761,"entry_id":1534,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Corps et continuit\u00e9. Remarques sur la \"nouvelle\" physique d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Corps et continuit\u00e9. Remarques sur la \"nouvelle\" physique d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"Dans l'horizon de l'\u00e9tude de la philosophie naturelle d'Averro\u00e8s, le nouveau travail de Ruth Glasner (RG) intitul\u00e9 Averroes' Physics: a Turning Point in Medieval Natural Philosophy occupera assur\u00e9ment une place de premier plan. Dans cet ouvrage, RG propose une \u00e9tude analytique des trois commentaires d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 la Physique d'Aristote - l'Abr\u00e9g\u00e9, le Commentaire Moyen et le Grand Commentaire. La force incontestable de son travail r\u00e9side tout d'abord dans son approche double du texte d'Averro\u00e8s, \u00e0 la fois philologique et th\u00e9orique. Tout au long de son analyse, ces deux aspects restent intimement li\u00e9s et la mobilisation des instruments philologiques n'est jamais une fin en soi. Cette analyse a en effet pour but ultime de reconstruire le syst\u00e8me du monde tel qu'Averro\u00e8s le concevait. L'enjeu fondamental de cette \u00e9tude est alors de supplanter la vision d'un Averro\u00e8s interpr\u00e8te servile de la physique aristot\u00e9licienne et de pr\u00e9senter sa conception de la nature comme un syst\u00e8me coh\u00e9rent, organique et original.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1534,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"299\u2013318"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averroès à Phys. I, 1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 189–223 |
| Categories | Thomas, Commentary, Physics, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1382","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1382,"authors_free":[{"id":1574,"entry_id":1382,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1"},"abstract":"The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1382,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"189\u2013223"}},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Corps et continuité. Remarques sur la "nouvelle" physique d'Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 299–318 |
| Categories | Review, Physics |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Dans l'horizon de l'étude de la philosophie naturelle d'Averroès, le nouveau travail de Ruth Glasner (RG) intitulé Averroes' Physics: a Turning Point in Medieval Natural Philosophy occupera assurément une place de premier plan. Dans cet ouvrage, RG propose une étude analytique des trois commentaires d'Averroès à la Physique d'Aristote - l'Abrégé, le Commentaire Moyen et le Grand Commentaire. La force incontestable de son travail réside tout d'abord dans son approche double du texte d'Averroès, à la fois philologique et théorique. Tout au long de son analyse, ces deux aspects restent intimement liés et la mobilisation des instruments philologiques n'est jamais une fin en soi. Cette analyse a en effet pour but ultime de reconstruire le système du monde tel qu'Averroès le concevait. L'enjeu fondamental de cette étude est alors de supplanter la vision d'un Averroès interprète servile de la physique aristotélicienne et de présenter sa conception de la nature comme un système cohérent, organique et original. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1534","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1534,"authors_free":[{"id":1761,"entry_id":1534,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Corps et continuit\u00e9. Remarques sur la \"nouvelle\" physique d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Corps et continuit\u00e9. Remarques sur la \"nouvelle\" physique d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"Dans l'horizon de l'\u00e9tude de la philosophie naturelle d'Averro\u00e8s, le nouveau travail de Ruth Glasner (RG) intitul\u00e9 Averroes' Physics: a Turning Point in Medieval Natural Philosophy occupera assur\u00e9ment une place de premier plan. Dans cet ouvrage, RG propose une \u00e9tude analytique des trois commentaires d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 la Physique d'Aristote - l'Abr\u00e9g\u00e9, le Commentaire Moyen et le Grand Commentaire. La force incontestable de son travail r\u00e9side tout d'abord dans son approche double du texte d'Averro\u00e8s, \u00e0 la fois philologique et th\u00e9orique. Tout au long de son analyse, ces deux aspects restent intimement li\u00e9s et la mobilisation des instruments philologiques n'est jamais une fin en soi. Cette analyse a en effet pour but ultime de reconstruire le syst\u00e8me du monde tel qu'Averro\u00e8s le concevait. L'enjeu fondamental de cette \u00e9tude est alors de supplanter la vision d'un Averro\u00e8s interpr\u00e8te servile de la physique aristot\u00e9licienne et de pr\u00e9senter sa conception de la nature comme un syst\u00e8me coh\u00e9rent, organique et original.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1534,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"299\u2013318"}},"sort":["Corps et continuit\u00e9. Remarques sur la \"nouvelle\" physique d'Averro\u00e8s"]}
| Title | Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averroès à Phys. I, 1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 189–223 |
| Categories | Thomas, Commentary, Physics, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1382","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1382,"authors_free":[{"id":1574,"entry_id":1382,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1"},"abstract":"The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1382,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"189\u2013223"}},"sort":["Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1"]}